Contributed by Koby Polaski, Senior Attorney, Edwards Office
As expected, the Federal Government today filed a Notice
of Appeal and Motion for Emergency Stay of Judge Hanen’s order
issuing an injunction in the case of Texas v. United States.
If granted, the Stay would allow United States
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to begin accepting applications
for expanded DACA and continue work to implement DAPA. An injunction issued by
Texas Judge Andrew Hanen temporarily halted the implementation of both
programs.
The twenty-six states who filed the lawsuit in Texas
challenging the legality of President Obama’s executive action contend that DAPA
and expanded DACA are both subject to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA).
If subject to the APA, the government would have been required to undergo a
“notice-and-comment period” before implementing the new programs. In the Motion
for an Emergency Stay, the federal government argues that the deferred action
guidance is an exercise of prosecutorial discretion that is neither subject to
challenge by the States, nor required to be issued through notice-and-comment
rulemaking. The government requests a ruling on the Stay by the close of
business on February 25; absent a ruling, it will consider seeking relief
before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The filing of this Emergency Stay provides some
welcome good news. We hope and expect for more as this litigation plays out.
There are strong arguments in support of the government’s case, and previous
lawsuits in other district courts have failed. The deferred action guidance was
a lawful exercise of the president’s executive power, and we anticipate that
both expanded DACA and DAPA will eventually move forward. Stay tuned to the
Joseph Law Firm blog for the latest developments.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.