Showing posts with label Joseph Law Firm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joseph Law Firm. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Law Students' Interest in Immigration Law Growing!

According to a June 21, 2010 Denver Post article, interest in immigration law among law students in Colorado is growing. At both of Colorado’s law schools, the University of Denver, and the University of Colorado, law students are pushing for clinics and classes dedicated to immigration law. In just the past several years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of classes offered at DU, as well as in increase in students who are interested in completing internships related to immigration law. The article states that immigration law is considered the second most complicated legal field, next to tax. Unfortunately for students who wish to practice immigration law upon graduation, although there is a very high need for qualified immigration attorneys, there are few employment opportunities.

The Joseph Law Firm, P.C. (JLF) is one of only a handful of immigration law firms in the Denver and Colorado Springs. Fortunately for law students in Colorado, JLF offers several internships to law students each semester. This provides valuable experience for law students in their professional endeavors, and it also provides the field of immigration law with new attorneys who are well-versed in the field. With the high number of applicants for these valuable, volunteer-based internships, JLF is able to choose those students most dedicated to the field and to helping people in need.

To read the full text of the Denver Post article, visit: http://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_15340281.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Associate Attorney, Aaron Hall: Arizona Anti-Immigrant Law Casts Shadow on Cinco de Mayo Celebrations


Happy Cinco de Mayo! Well, maybe not the happiest for those in Arizona. On May 5, 1862, the Mexican army triumphed in a battle over the French and spawned an annual commemoration which has evolved into a passionate celebration of Mexican culture and heritage. As people of all origins across America observe this day by going to parades, fesitivals , or just by enjoying some Mexican cuisine and a margarita, all is not well for Mexican-Americans.




Frustration and exasperation over the failure of the federal government to address this country's broken immigration system has led to the passage of Arizona Senate Bill 1070, a law which will make being present in Arizona without immigration status a state crime and require Arizona police officers to ask for proof of legal status based on "reasonable suspicion." Unfortunately, the new Arizona law is ill-conceived and will inevitably result in the unfair and illegitimate detention of United States citizens, permanent residents, and those here in legitimate non-immigrant status. The new Arizona law will also create an inherently offensive system of law enforcement through racial profiling.




United States citizens, lawful immigrants, and those here in other lawful status will be detained if they cannot produce a document showing their status on the spot. The problem is that many people may not be able to produce such documents for various reasons. Some people may not have ready access to birth certificates due to having lost it, due to having had it stolen or destroyed, due to family separation mental illness, homelessness or a myriad of other reasons. These people, having committed no other offense, could be detained for hours or days while they seek a way to prove legal status. Also, certain persons in lawful status simply will not be able to show proof of such based on the complications inherent in immigration law. For example:




  • People with with pending applications for extension or change of status will have an I-94 card that is expired, but while the application remains pending, they are in a period of stay authorized by the attorney general;


  • Students are admitted for duration of status and their I-94 cards do not have an expiration date;


  • Applicants who have applications for adjustment of status that are pending are in a period of stay authorized by the attorney general but will not have a document to prove it;


  • Individuals who have conditional permanent residence based on a marriage and have filed a petition to remove the conditions but have not yet received the actual card;


  • Individuals who are in removal proceedings or have cases on appeal.


Furthermore, the legal determination as to whether an individual is in lawful status is one that often requires thorough investigation or litigation, during which the person presumably could be detained under Arizona law. An officer on the street does not have the time, training or resources to make such a determination on the spot. Yet, under the new law, the police department can be sued by any private citizen if that citizen does not believe the police are enforcing the new law and he or she thinks they should.



Apart from those who are lawfully here who would inevitably be harmed by this law, the very notion that any of us can be required to produce papers at any time to prove our right to be in Arizona based on some nebulous concept of "reasonable suspicion"is an affront to individual liberties. Though the law says that race, alone, cannot form the basis for reasonable suspicion, we have yet to hear other specific factors that would combine with race to form a "reasonable suspicion." It seems that race and accent will clearly be the dominant factors in forming this determination. Unfortunately, this is likely to cause fear of and animosity towards law enforcement by immigrant communities, including U.S. citizens and documented and undocumented immigrants. Such distrust and fear will only hamper state police in investigating serious crimes which truly deserve the attention of their talent and resources.



Federal action must be taken to secure our border and fix the current irretrievably broken system. This Cinco de Mayo will feature an annual celebration of the wonders and contributions of Mexican culture in America against the backdrop of Arizona Senate Bill 1070--a law which demands a wasteful use of resources, inevitable mistaken detention of U.S. citizens and others in lawful status who have committed no other offense, costly litigation against the state, and a repugnant institutionalization of racial profiling. In Arizona, Mexican Americans will suffer the brunt of this clumsily drawn attempt to address our broken system. All of us, however, should recognize this legislation as a call to demand federal action in the form of comprehensive immigration reform. Only after such a reform can we have secure borders, sensible and enforceable immigration policies, and a future of fifth days of May where we can celebrate the cultural richness and economic benefits of legal immigration without the shadow of hastily drawn patchwork laws like Arizona Senate Bill 1070.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Why are U.S.-allied refugees still branded as 'terrorists?'

WASHINGTON — Almost every day for three years, prison guards at one of Saddam Hussein's most notorious prisons tortured Sami Alkarim.

Now, in a cruel twist of fate, the accomplished Iraqi artist is being treated like a terrorist by the U.S., the country where he sought refuge.

U.S. officials have told him they can't give him permanent residency in Denver because of messenger work he did as a teenager for the same political party that counts the current prime minister of Iraq as a member.

Alkarim's problems have their roots in post-Sept. 11 anti-terrorism laws that the Obama and Bush administrations vowed to fix.

Despite that pledge, the number of people who've been told their requests for refugee status, asylum or green cards won't be processed because of the laws has risen from 5,304 in December to 7,286 in June.

The broad language of the Patriot Act and other laws bars refugees and asylum seekers from living and working in the U.S. if they supported or were members of an armed group in their homelands. They're considered terrorists or supporters of terrorists even if they opposed dictators or helped the U.S. government.

Although Congress has attempted to give the executive branch the power to grant waivers in such cases, the Obama administration, like the Bush administration before it, has yet to set up an efficient way to handle them, refugee advocates say.

"As far as I can tell, the situation has only grown worse," said Thomas Ragland, a former Justice Department lawyer attorney who now represents several immigrants affected by the laws. Ragland's clients include an Iraqi, an Ethiopian, a Nepali, and a Burmese.
Department of Homeland Security officials in charge of reviewing the matter declined a request for an interview.

Matthew Chandler, a DHS spokesman, said the department has granted more than 10,500 waivers to people impacted by the laws, proof that the cases aren't being ignored.
"While the department views this achievement as significant, we also understand that a more efficient authorization process than the one that has been in place would reach even more people," he said.

DHS is working with other agencies, such as the State Department, to come up with a solution that also would weigh U.S. security interests, he said.
Immigrants and their lawyers, however, remain mystified by the government's inability to cut through the red tape to eliminate such problems. Many of the waivers were given to Burmese refugees, while other worthy refugees and asylum seekers are overlooked, advocates said.
"I can't tell how much of this madness is policy and how much of it is just madness," said Anwen Hughes, the senior counsel for Human Rights First's Refugee Protection Program.

Previously, immigrants who were denied a green card after being given asylum were told they wouldn't be deported. Officials said their cases would eventually be resolved.

However, the DHS began recently sending some immigrants letters informing them that the agency intends to revoke their asylum. As a result, they'd be deported.

The cases include immigrants who were granted asylum after fleeing Zimbabwe as members of the Movement for Democratic Change, the main opponent of autocrat Robert Mugabe. In June, President Obama met with the leader of the party, Morgan Tsvangirai, and praised him for his courage.

Some of the most startling stories involve Iraqis — some of whom have worked for the U.S. government under threat of death and now could have even more to fear as U.S. troops are redeployed.

In one recent case, a middle-aged Iraqi mother of two teenagers was deemed a terrorist and barred refuge in the U.S. despite her work for the State Department as an economic development adviser.

Anna, as she is known by her American colleagues, is seen as a supporter of terrorism because of her work for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan, a mainstream Iraqi political party that the current president of Iraq belongs to. She's no longer active in the party.

Anonymous callers have warned her that they'd take revenge for her work for the U.S. government.

Now, she wonders in a phone call from Iraq punctuated by sirens and static, "What will be my future?"

Army Lt. Col. Dennis Chapman, who worked with her when he was the chief of a military transition team in the Kurdish region of Iraq, said he doesn't understand why the U.S. government would reject someone who's proved to be an ally in need of help.

"It's an absurd finding," he said. "It deprives the word 'terrorism' of any meaning."
Anna, who's being helped by the international law firm Holland & Knight, is appealing the decision. As part of a nonprofit effort, the law firm has helped more than 300 Iraqis affiliated with the U.S. government.

Alkarim, who fled as a refugee to the U.S. in February 2001, can't work or travel, even though his wife and children have already become U.S. citizens.

In 2007, Alkarim sued the U.S. government in an effort to get his green card application moving. Although the Obama administration tried to get the lawsuit dismissed, a federal judge in Denver has allowed it to proceed and could rule soon.

Alkarim's lawyer, Jeff Joseph, agreed to take the case free. Justice Department attorneys, however, have told him if DHS is ordered by the judge to act, they'll likely deny Alkarim's request for permanent residency. The government lawyers suggested that his client might have better luck if he simply dropped the suit.

Recently, Alkarim's artwork was selected to be shown at Italy's Biennial of Florence, which bills itself as one of the largest exhibition of contemporary art in the world.
His abstract expressionist paintings were considered subversive by Saddam Hussein's regime — one of the reasons he was imprisoned.

His artwork will be displayed in December without him, however, because he doesn't have his green card. He said he's also had to turn down invitations to galleries in Switzerland, Dubai, France and London.

"It would be an honor to represent the United States," the 43-year-old said. "But I can't say I'm American."

Thursday, July 2, 2009

USCIS, FBI ELIMINATE NATIONAL NAME CHECK BACKLOG

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that, in partnership with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), it has met all milestones set forth in a joint business plan announced April 2, 2008, resulting in the elimination of the FBI National Name Check Program (NNCP) backlog."Our close partnership with the FBI has resulted in the accomplishment of this significant achievement with national security as its foundation," said USCIS Acting Deputy Director Michael Aytes. "This continued working relationship will help to ensure that name check processing is accomplished as quickly as possible without compromising security concerns."The final goal of the business plan was to achieve a sustainable performance level by the NNCP of completing 98 percent of name check requests submitted by USCIS within 30 days, and the remaining two percent within 90 days. In the majority of instances, however, the completion of a backlogged FBI name check has resulted in a "no record response." As a result, USCIS has been able to resume normal processing of most cases which most often ends in a final determination of eligibility. Next steps in the adjudication of cases that were previously delayed as a result a pending FBI name check request may now include updating fingerprint results, scheduling interviews, requesting additional evidence and other reviews to determine whether the applicant is eligible for the requested immigration benefit.

To read more about this article, visit www.USCIS.org

KIRBY JOSEPH & JOHN GRIFFIN PUBLISH ARTICLE IN IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY LAW HANDBOOK

Joseph Law Firm, P.C. Managing Partner Kirby Joseph and Office Manager John Griffin had their article entitled "The Immigration Law Firm Stimulus Package: Diversifying Your Practice and Increasing Law Firm Profitability Through Effective Billing Procedures" published in the 2009-2010 edition of the Immigration & Nationality Law Handbook.

To learn more about Joseph Law Firm, P.C. staff, visit the About Us page on our website: www.ImmigrationIssues.com

JEFF JOSEPH ELECTED TO THE AILA BOARD OF GOVERNORS

In June 2009, Jeff D. Joseph, Esq. was elected to the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) National Board of Governors for a three-year term. AILA is the National Bar Association for Immigration Attorneys and consists of 11,000 members. The Board of Governors is the governing body of the organization and Jeff Joseph is one of 21 elected directors.

USCIS RESUMES PREMIUM PROCESSING SERVICE FOR FORM I-140, Immigrant Petition For Alien Worker

USCIS announced that effective June 29, 2009, it will resume Premium Processing Service for Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker. Under the Premium Processing Service, USCIS guarantees petitioners that, for a $1,000 processing fee, it will issue either an approval notice, or where appropriate, a notice of intent to deny, a request for evidence or open an investigation for fraud or misrepresentation, within 15 calendar days of receipt. If the petition is not processed within 15 calendar days, USCIS will refund the $1,000 fee and continue to process the request as part of the Premium Processing Service. In addition to faster processing, petitioners who participate in the program may use a dedicated phone number and e-mail address to check on the status of their petition or ask any other questions they may have concerning their petition. Premium Processing Service continues to be available for previously designated classifications within Form I-140 and Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant worker. To read more about this update, visit the USCIS website at: www.USCIS.gov

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

THE CAP HAS NOT BEEN REACHED! USCIS CONTINUES TO ACCEPT H-1B PETITIONS

There are still a number of H1-B Visas available, but you will need to file now!
Contact Joseph Law Firm, P.C. at 303-297-9171 or at www.immigrationissues.com to inquire about the available H1-B visas.

USCIS announced it continues to accept H-1B nonimmigrant visa petitions subject to the fiscal year 2010 (FY 2010) cap. USCIS will continue to monitor the number of H-1B petitions received for both the 65,000 regular cap and the 20,000 U.S. master's degree or higher educational exemption cap.

USCIS has received approximately 44,000 H-1B petitions counting toward the Congressionally-mandated 65,000 cap. The agency continues to accept petitions subject to the general cap.

Joseph Law Firm, P.C. Receives Special Recognition from the Colorado Supreme Court


The firm was recognized by the Colorado Supreme Court Pro Bono Service Project. To receive the recognition, Joseph Law Firm, P.C. had to commit to 50 hours of pro bono service for each attorney in the law firm for 2008. This is the second year Joseph Law Firm, P.C. has been recognized for this pro bono service project.

Jeff D. Joseph, Esq. is pictured here with Colorado Supreme Court Justices Alex Martinez, Stephen Bender, Allison Eid and Gregory Hobbs.

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Seminar on Working Visa Options for International Artists, Entertainers, Models and Athletes

Joseph Law Firm, P.C. is pleased to announce a half-day seminar on non immigrant visa options for international artists, entertainers, models and athletes. The United States has always prized itself on being a country that celebrates international culture and sports. We draw talent from all over the world to our sporting arenas, theaters and concert venues. For this reason, it is important to understand the challenges involved in the cross-border movement of international artists, entertainers, models and athletes. Download a Brochure!


The seminar will explore the various visa options available to international artists, entertainers, models and athletes and the requirements and challenges with each visa option. The seminar will discuss the evidence tests in each visa option and the ways that immigration attorneys, sports and entertainment attorneys and talent agents can work together to facilitate the travel and work authorization of international talent.


We invite all to join us for this event, please see below for information on how to RSVP.


For more information about Joseph Law Firm, P.C., visit our website!


To register for the seminar visit http://www.immigrationissues.com or call (303) 297-9171

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Voting: Do it because you can

This is a day where I am so proud to be an immigration attorney. Today I received a message from Tony Suda. Tony has been a client of Joseph Law Firm, P.C. for several years. Today, he cast his first ballot as a Citizen of the United States of America. He e-mailed me to express his gratitude for our services and to describe the emotion that he felt as he cast his ballot in this historic election. This is a picture of Tony, casting his vote.

On this day, we will elect our first African-American President or our first female Vice President. This is truly an amazing and inspirational step-forward for our democracy. However, on this historic day, as Barack Obama and Sarah Palin enter the ballot booths, it is important to remember that African-Americans did not even enjoy the right to vote until 140 years ago when Congress passed the 15th Amendment. It is even more shocking that women did not have the right to vote until 1920 when the 19th Amendment was passed. Voting is the ultimate symbol of political power and denial of the right to vote the ultimate tool of political disenfranchisement.

I am struck by the fundamental importance of the vote and the power of the vote as a tool for political, societal and moral change. People have marched, struggled and died to exercise the right. The ability to vote is the single most important of our Constitutional rights. It is our vote that enables us to elect our leaders, to determine which ballot initiatives reflect our values, who will speak for us in government, and who will express our will in the laws that are passed for our communities and our country.

At the same time it is important to know that many of the people I represent have never enjoyed this most fundamental of rights. In fact, many of them have come to this country fleeing oppressive governmental regimes that would imprison, torture or kill them for even considering expressing political opinions that are contrary to those of the political party in power. To these individuals, their ultimate dream in seeking refuge in the United States is that one day, they too would be able to freely cast their vote, voice an opinion--even a contrary one--and live to tell about it.

Immigrants do not have the right to vote. This is a right reserved exclusively to citizens. For many immigrants, it is a decades-long and torturous road to citizenship and the right to vote, but it is one that they are more than willing to take. To the extent that they have no right to vote, immigrants (both documented and undocumented) are the most politically disenfranchised group of people living in our country.

It is a travesty that those most effected by our nonsensical and broken immigration system are completely powerless to change it. It is up to us as Citizens today to cast our votes for leaders who will be courageous enough to fix our broken system, and it is up to our elected leaders, whoever they may be, to put politics aside and fix it.

Fixing our broken system means allowing the millions of undocumented people who are living here, paying taxes and contributing to our economy to come out of the shadows. It means sorting between those who are here to do us harm and those who are merely trying to provide a decent living for their families. It means allowing those who are willing to learn English, pay taxes and avoid committing crimes to regularize their status and to put them on a pathway to citizenship. It means ending the decades-long backlogs in family and employment based immigration and eliminating the systemic incentives to cross the border illegally because it is impossible to do it legally. It means creating a sensible guestworker program that matches willing workers with needing employers so as to improve our economy and create jobs.

Cast your vote today. Cast it because you can. Cast it for the sake of the millions around the world and in our own country who do not have the freedom or power to voice an opinion.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Rational Thinking on Immigration and Crime . . .

Last week, a tragedy occurred within a couple of miles of my office in Aurora, Colorado. A 23-year-old man barrelled his car into a pick up truck that was parked outside the store. The truck careened through the glass walls of a Baskin Robbins ice cream store killing both passengers in the truck and three-year-old Martin Kudlis who was inside enjoying his last ice cream.




Police arrested 23-year-0ld Francis Hernandez after the incident. Hernandez now faces very serious charges of vehicular homicide, hit and run, and vehicular assault among others. Hernandez has a lengthy rap sheet and has had run-ins with the law before. He now will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law and face the consequences of his actions. Those consequences will include not only legal penalties, but the heavy weight on his conscience of the lives that he has taken.




This tragedy is completely incomprehensible. There is no explanation for why things like this happen in our world, and when things are incomprehensible, we want answers. We search for reasons--we look for blame. It is natural. Immediately after the tragedy, the public wanted somewhere to project their sorrows and somewhere to place the blame, and as often occurs, the public turned its blame to the system. There were immediate accusations that Hernandez must be undocumented. There were questions raised regarding his citizenship. There were complaints filed against the Aurora police department and Immigration and Customs Enforcement alleging that Hernandez was an "illegal" immigrant and that he had somehow bucked the system and escaped deportation. They claimed that this would never have happened had Hernandez been deported.


In anger and pain, the public called for radical, draconian and flat-out unconstitutional changes to the laws. The public demanded that bail be denied to non-citizens who get caught in the criminal system. The public called for prosecutors to refuse to give plea agreements to non-citizens. While the public is rightfully angry for this tragedy, laws made out of emotions make for bad law. Furthermore, such knee-jerk reactions to tragedy only serve to divert the attention away from the victims of this tragedy and further divide us when we should come together.


While Hernandez should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law for this offense, it is important to clarify that he did not commit this offense because of his country of origin. He did not commit this offense because of his status in this country. He did not commit this offense because he is a citizen or because he is not a citizen. Those facts have nothing to do with the commission of this offense. While the public should be angry at Hernandez for this tragedy and for the lives lost, it should end there.


The anger that the public displays is greatly fueled by persistent myths in the media regarding immigration and criminality. The media constantly bombards the public with the myth that immigrants are somehow more violent that citizens and that they are more prone to crime than native-born citizens. The facts simply demonstrate otherwise.


Statistics from the Immigration Policy Center bear out the following actual facts about immigrants and crime:


Immigrants are 5 times less likely to be in prison than the native born.


A 2007 study by UC-Irvine sociologist Ruben G. Rumbaut found that the 3.5% incarceration rate for native-born men age 18-39 was five times higher than the 0.7% rate for immigrant men in 2000.


Undocumented immigration is NOT associated with higher crime rates.



The Bureau of Justice Statistics found that although the undocumented immigrant population doubled from 1994 to 2005, the violent crime rate in the United States declined by 34.2% and the property crime rate fell by 26.4% in the same period. Border cities and other cities with large immigrant populations also experienced decreasing crime rates.



Crime is lowest in States with the most immigrants.



According to a 2008 report from the conservative Americas Majority Foundation, crime rates are lowest in states with the highest immigration growth rates. From 1999 to 2006, the total crime rate declined 13.6% in the 19 highest-immigration states, compared to a 7.1% decline in the other 32 states. In 2006, the 10 "high influx" states--those with the most dramatic, recent increases in immigration--had the lowest rates of violent crime and total crime.

New Jersey: An analysis from the New Jersey Department of Corrections and U.S. Census Bureau by New Jersey's Star Ledger in April 2008 found that "US citizens are twice as likely to land in New Jersey's prisons as legal and illegal immigrants." In fact, "non-US citizens make up 10% of the state's overall population, but just 5% of the inmates in prison."

California: Foreign-born adults in California have lower incarceration rates than their native-born counterparts. According to a June 2008 report from the Public Policy Institute of California, "the incarceration rate for foreign-born adults is 297 per 100,000 in the population, compared with 813 per 100,000 for US-born adults. The foreign-born, who make up roughly 35% of California's adult population, constitute 17% of the state prison population, a proportion that has remained fairly constant since 1990."



In the face of this tragedy, now is the time for us to come together. Let us not be divided by scapegoating and rash policy-making based on fear. Do not let myths and stereotypes blind us to the facts.



In this time of tragedy, let us not forget that three-year-old Martin Kudlis was himself the child of Russian immigrants who came to this country because this country was founded on principles of justice, fairness and equality before the law.