Sunday, August 29, 2010

DREAM Act Could Impact 700,000 Immigrants

The Sunday Denver Post included a sad and interesting editorial on the prospective DREAM Act and the 700,000 undocumented immigrants it could impact. The DREAM Act would give conditional permanent residence to young people who enter the country illegally under the age of 16 and attend college or serve in the military.

Daniel Glick of High Country News followed the journey of a young Taiwanese man named Chih Tsung Kao, who illegally entered the United States with his family when he was four years old. Chih attended high school and college (at the Colorado School of Mines) in the United States. After college, Chih refused to spend his life working in the service sector, but couldn't get a job as an engineer. Without options in the United States, Chih made the difficult decision to return to his native Taiwan - where he had a job offer and could contribute to society.

Chih's story is, unfortunately, all too common among teenagers and young adults in the United States. If adopted, the DREAM Act could provide options for children like Chih, who enter the United States unknowingly and are later left completely without options.

Read the Denver Post article here:
http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_15906274

Friday, August 27, 2010

Hope for Detainees

A memo issued by ICE Assistant Director John Morton on August 20, 2010 offers hopes to thousands of immigrants with applications pending before USCIS. Citing as his objective the promotion of "...the efficient use of government resources, Mr. Morton's new policies include expedited adjudication of applications and petitions for both detained and non-detained aliens, and dismissal without prejudice of certain removal cases "where no serious or adverse factors exist." To read the memo in it's entirety, click here:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/us/27immig_memo.pdf

Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Phony Immigration Attorney Indicted on Felony Charges

The dangers of those posing as immigration lawyers even though they are unlicensed were again highlighted on Monday in New York. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office indicted a man posing to be an immigration lawyer on charges of Grand Larceny in the Third Degree, Scheme to Defraud in the First Degree, Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree, Unauthorized Practice of Law, and violations of various subsections of the Immigration Assistance Services Law. All too typically, this man defrauded people out of thousands of dollars, promised them green cards which never materialized, and disappeared when they tried to contact him about what had happened with their cases. If he is convicted, he could spend more than 7 years in prison.

For the District Attorney's Press Release, click here.

Improved Customer Service on USCIS.gov

Earlier this month U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the launch of new web features on USCIS.gov that are designed to expand the access of case information for users of the website. These new features are part of USCIS’s commitment to improve customer service and provide improved access to case status information, essentially reducing the need for customers to make InfoPass appointments to speak with a USCIS representative in-person.

The website enhancements include a new online inquiry tool, tailored case status information, and new features for Spanish-speaking users (available at USCIS.gov/espanol). The online inquiry tool allows customers to submit an electronic inquiry directly to a USCIS Field Office or Service Center to request case status information if their application is outside the posted processing times. Unfortunately, this inquiry tool is only available to check the status of an Application to Replace Permanent Resident Card or an Application for Naturalization. However, the response time of USCIS if you use the inquiry tool is now less, as they are committed to responding within 15 days instead of the previous commitment of 30 days.

As for Spanish-speaking customers, they can now receive Spanish e-mail updates about their case status and they can also change their address online in Spanish.

To read more and to access these new features, please visit: USCIS.gov

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Secure Communities Not Performing Stated Objective

Secure Communities relies on local law enforcement agencies to share their arrest data with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to apprehend undocumented immigrants. After an arrest, an inmate's fingerprints are scanned and sent to a database of state, FBI, and immigration records. ICE matches the fingerprints with those in its own database; when it finds a match, it issues a detainer and moves the inmate from criminal to immigration custody.

The stated goal of Secure Communities is to allow ICE to prevent undocumented immigrants with serious criminal records from being released from jails. Since 2008, Secure Communities has led to the removal of 47,000 people.

Despite the purported objective of Secure Communities, government data shows 12,293 people deported as a result of the program were considered non-criminals. And others were picked up for low-level offenses such as driving without a license. Because the program fails to focus exclusively on high-level offenders, critics say that Secure Communities simultaneously encourages police to arrest people who have not committed a crime to check their immigration status and discourages immigrants from reporting criminal activity.

Read PBS's article on Secure Communities here: http://www.pbs.org/wnet/need-to-know/security/video-immigration-crackdown-creates-insecure-communities/2964/

Thursday, August 19, 2010

Suicides Among U.S. Border Patrol Agents Increase

Since February of 2008 at least 15 U.S. Border Patrol agents have committed suicide. This is the largest spike in suicides the agency has seen in the last 20 years. Officials are unsure of the exact cause of the increase in suicide rate and some insist the suicides have nothing to do with the agency itself.

Due to the increasingly violent U.S.-Mexico border, the Border Patrol has doubled in size since 2004. All but two of the most recent deaths involved agents in Texas, California and Arizona. Administrators for the agency have started suicide-prevention initiatives, including training for supervisors, videos about the warning signs, and other educational programs for Border Patrol agents all across the nation.

It is reported that suicide rates among law enforcement are usually higher than the general population; however, the Border Patrol now ranks above the typical rates for law enforcement.

To read more about the possible causes of suicides among Border Patrol agents, please visit: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38727328/ns/us_news-security

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Colorado Representatives Meet with Arizona Lawmakers

On Tuesday, Colorado Republicans met with lawmakers in Arizona to discuss that state’s new, controversial immigration enforcement law, and to get pointers on how to implement a similar law in Colorado. As reported by the San Francisco Examiner, Colorado representative Kent Lambert indicated that he and the other representatives wanted to present similar legislation in the state of Colorado because "We have sort of the backfield problems with employment, jobs, and unemployment and picking up the costs of health care and things like that which seem to fall upon the state of Colorado." Rep. Lambert is one of 11 members of Colorado's Republican Study Committee who are meeting with Arizona legislators this week. Colorado joins Tennessee and Utah in having sent a delegation to Arizona to discuss the new law.

In fact, undocumented immigrants have been found by economists to have little to no negative impact on employment, job availability, or wages, and many pay taxes. Additionally, the presence of immigrants, documented and undocumented alike, actually boosts local economies and creates jobs, as immigrant families spend their incomes on American goods ranging from cars to groceries.

A law like Arizona’s is not the answer to the U.S.’s economic concerns, as it does nothing to address job creation or a path to legalization for undocumented workers, but instead encourages fear and invites discrimination. Let’s hope that it’s all talk and no action.



Read more at the San Francisco Examiner, National Public Radio, and the ACLU websites: http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/ap/colorado-gop-wants-immigration-law-like-arizonas-100909199.html#ixzz0wypMEMg2

http://www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/immigrants-and-economy

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5312900

Friday, August 13, 2010

Border Security Bill Signed Today by Obama

Today President Obama signed a new border security bill known as the Southwest Border Security Bill. According to a statement issued by the White House, the bill provides $600 million “to enhance technology at the border, share information and support with state, local and tribal law enforcement, and increase (federal) presence and law enforcement activities at the border.”

The bill will provide increased agents, investigators, and prosecutors in an effort to target illicit trafficking of people, drugs, illegal weapons and money. The hiring of 1,000 new Border Patrol agents will be funded by the bill, in addition to the hiring of more Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. The new Border Patrol agents will be deployed at critical areas along the border.

For more information, please visit the following sites:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2010/08/obama-signs-border-security-bill/1
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38692070/ns/politics

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Birthright Citizenship is Settled Law and Why We Shouldn't Change It

Over the last few weeks, politicians have been all over the cable news channels proposing hearings into whether the 14th Amendment really does mean that those born on American soil automatically citizens, regardless of whether their parents have immigration status. The crux of their argument (elaborated here) is the phrase in the 14th Amendment extending citizenship to those born in and “subject to the jurisdiction of” the United States. Some argue that this could be interpreted to exclude the children of undocumented aliens from birthright citizenship.

The problem with this argument is that it has already been heard and rejected by the Supreme Court in the 1898 case of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark. Given the longstanding precedent on this issue, any change to birthright citizenship would need to come through an amendment to the Constitution.

Though some are loudly calling for just such an amendment, the reality is that the elimination of birthright citizenship would be disastrous public policy. America should be proud of its history of success in assimilating wave after wave of immigrants from all corners of the world, even in the face of different periods of anti-immigrant sentiment. That the children of immigrants are born as Americans and are invited to fully participate in our democracy is key to our incredible history of successful integration of immigrant communities into this nation. To take this away risks bringing up a generation of stateless children who speak English like any other American but have no incentive to buy into the system and become productive members of society.

As Linda Chavez points out in a recent Wall Street Journal opinion piece, “Our history has been largely one of continuously expanding the community of people regarded as Americans, from native-born whites to freed slaves to Indians to naturalized citizens of all races and ethnicities. Since the abolition of slavery, we have never denied citizenship to any group of children born in the U.S.—even when we denied citizenship to their parents, as we did Asian immigrants from 1882 to 1943. This expansive view of who is an American has been critical to our successful assimilation of millions of newcomers.”

If this formula has helped drive so much success throughout our history, why change it now?

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Vote of “No Confidence” from the American Federation of Government Employees and National Homeland Security Council

Upon reviewing national news regarding immigration in the United States, immigration reform, and enforcement of the current laws, it was learned today that the American Federation of Government Employees (the Union representing over 600,000 government workers – according to its website) together with the National Homeland Security Council issued a scathing press release indicating a unanimous “Vote of No Confidence” for in the Director of Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE), John Morton, and the Assistant Director of the ICE Office of Detention Policy and Planning, Phyllis Coven.

At first glance, this may seem like a document that an immigration practitioner would be interested in, hoping to gain some insight into the minds of ICE officers and their frustrations with a system that is hopelessly broken and causing harm to individuals every day. Instead, the document lists nine inflammatory and wholly conclusory statements that are not backed up with any facts, statistics or links to compiled completed research. This lack of even attenuated research shows the leadership of these two organizations has no real interest in the fact that the current law is so irretrievably broken that the ICE officers it represents are faced daily with epic difficulty in enforcement. There is, additionally, an obvious complete lack of confidence in the Office of Professional Responsibility, the government body responsible for investigating complaints of professional misconduct of officers.

Unfortunately, each and every statement in the document does not cite to one iota of evidence or research, but instead makes sweeping and sometimes wholly false statements meant to incite anger and frustration, rather than a feeling of union and leadership. Most notably, the statement regarding “resort like living” at ICE detention centers. In 2008 Immigration & Customs Enforcement (ICE) reported that 113 individuals died while in the care of ICE between 2003 and 2008. One individual in particular, Mr. Boubacar Bah, who was in placed in ICE custody and held at the Elizabeth Detention Center, was injured when he fell in the restroom. Mr. Bah was taken to medical where he became incoherent and agitated (obvious signs of brain trauma) and was handcuffed, shackled and then written up for disobeying orders that he was unable to understand. While he lay on the floor vomiting, foaming at the mouth and writhing in pain. Instead of being given the treatment he deserved as a human being, he was left in a dark room for thirteen hours before someone in the center finally called 911. Mr. Bah was taken to a hospital where he underwent emergency surgery, slipped into a coma and died from a skull fracture. Subsequently, in the reports that the Union decries, it was learned that officials were plotting how to conceal their errors with Mr. Bah while he lay dying, rather that providing him with the care they have been charged with.

Additional violations of human rights at ICE detention centers include “physical and sexual abuse, substandard medical care, over-medication, inappropriate transfers, and other appalling indignities contrary to basic notions of due process” have been clearly documented by organizations including the ACLU, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Human Rights First, the Appleseed Foundation and the Department of Homeland Security Office of the Inspector General. Any increase in standards of care at detention facilities can hardly be called “resort like”.

There is no question that our system is broken and United States ICE Officers are daily faced with an overwhelming task; but instead of blaming two individuals charged with enforcing the laws like the officers they lead, the Union should assist in finding a way for their members to be able to work with leadership to continue to enforce the rule of law while our government hopefully finds a way to reform a system that does not work for anyone, including law enforcement.
http://www.ice.gov/partners/dro/dmp.htm

http://www.aclu.org/immigrants-rights/immigrant-detention

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/specials/immigration/cwc_d1p1.html

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

USCIS Memo Stirs Debate Regarding Comprehensive Immigration Reform

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) published a memo last week proposing various alternatives to Comprehensive Immigration Reform. As stated in the memo, in the absence of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, USCIS can extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations."

The 11-page memo was made public on Thursday by Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa. Its publication quickly angered opponents of Comprehensive Immigration Reform, who allege that the memo serves as Obama's way of creating a back door amnesty plan.

In sum, the memo suggests a variety of ways by which USCIS can repair several of the broken aspects of our current immigration system. For example, the memo proposes that USCIS "extend benefits and/or protections to many individuals and groups by issuing new guidance and regulations, exercising discretion with regard to deferred action and the issuance of Notices to Appear." Next, USCIS suggests allowing those currently in the United States under Temporary Protected Status to adjust or change status to that of lawful permanent residents. Equally relevant for millions of immigrant families is the suggestion that USCIS lessen the "extreme hardship" standard for those seeking waivers of inadmissibility in-country or abroad.

It remains to be seen whether USCIS will implement its suggestions outlined in the recent memo.

Read the entire document here: http://www.propublica.org/documents/item/memo-on-alternatives-to-comprehensive-immigration-reform

Monday, August 2, 2010

Update: U.S. Consulate in Ciudad Juarez Closed to Evaluate Threats

It was originally reported that the U.S. Consulate in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico closed on Friday to evaluate its security situation; however, new reports indicate that the closure was actually due to threats surrounding the consulate. U.S. officials have not yet released any details on the threats, but a State Department spokesman reports that they are unsure if the threats are directly related to the consulate itself or are general threats related to the whole Ciudad Juarez area.

Close to 300 individuals with consular appointments on Friday arrived at the consulate only to be left standing outside, unsure of what to do. One individual who showed up at the consulate on Friday for her scheduled appointment mentions that upon calling the call center for the consulate, she was told they had no information.

To read the full article, please visit http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38479237/ns/world_news-americas

Sunday, August 1, 2010

The "Down Payment" Plan for Immigration Reform

Some immigrant rights groups are shifting the strategy in their so-far unsuccessful push to overhaul immigration law: They're calling the new tactic the "down payment" approach.
Aware that the clock is running out, and there are no guarantees that a Congress that is supportive of immigration reform will be returned in November Antonio Gonzales, president of the William C. Velásquez Institute, a Latino public policy group, explained "We took a deep breath and said, 'Okay, we need a Plan B.' "
That plan centers on lobbying hard for the passage of two bills: AgJobs and the Dream Act. AgJobs is a compromise between farmworker unions and agriculture business groups, which was negotiated more than five years ago and is intended to provide legal farm labor and protect the rights of immigrant workers. The Dream Act would give some undocumented students the ability to apply for permanent residency. Both bills have had Republican support in the past.

Read more about the "down payment" plan at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/27/AR2010072704307.html